Introducing KNOVA — A free reading app with curriculum-aligned passages on History & Science for Grades 3-8Learn More →

17th Amendment — Reading Comprehension

No ratings yet

Premium Resource

Grades

Standards

HSS 8.12.3
RI.6-8.1
RI.6-8.3

Rate this resource

Send Feedback / Report an Issue

About This Reader

This reading passage examines the 17th Amendment and its transformative impact on the election of U.S. Senators, providing students with a nuanced look at the causes, effects, and controversies surrounding Progressive Era reforms. Through a clear problem/solution structure, students will explore how state legislatures originally selected senators, why this system became criticized for corruption and lack of representation, and how the 17th Amendment introduced direct election as a solution. The passage features rigorous academic vocabulary, a glossary, Spanish translation, and a simpler differentiated version for accessibility. Accompanying activities include a multiple-choice quiz, writing prompts, graphic organizers, and a timeline, all aligned to HSS 8.12.3 and CCSS.RI.6-8.1, RI.6-8.3. Read aloud audio and graphic organizers support diverse learners. This resource is ideal for teaching about the Progressive Era and the evolution of American democracy.

CONTENT PREVIEW

[William Jennings Bryan signing proclamation, 17th Amendment]
Source: Library of Congress

The 17th Amendment to the United States Constitution changed the way Americans select their senators. Before 1913, senators were chosen by each state's legislature instead of by direct vote of the people. This system was created in 1787 to give state governments more control over national laws, but over time, problems began to arise.

During the late 1800s, many Americans became concerned about corruption and unfair influence in the selection of senators. Powerful business interests, known as political machines, often controlled state legislatures. As a result, some senators represented the interests of wealthy groups rather than the people of their states. This issue became particularly serious during the Progressive Era, a period of widespread reform aimed at making government more democratic and responsive.

Reformers argued that the indirect election of senators led to gridlock, as legislatures sometimes failed to agree on a candidate. This left states without full representation in Congress for months or even years. Citizens began to demand a more transparent and accountable process. Newspaper articles and activists provided evidence of bribery and shady deals, increasing public pressure for change.

The solution came with the proposal and eventual ratification of the 17th Amendment in 1913. This amendment established the direct election of senators by the people of each state. Instead of being selected by legislatures, senators would now be chosen by popular vote. Supporters believed this would reduce corruption and make senators more accountable to their voters.

The 17th Amendment had a significant impact on American democracy. It shifted power from state governments to the people and made the Senate more responsive to public opinion. However, some critics argued that it weakened states' rights and upset the balance of power between state and federal government. Despite this debate, most historians agree that the amendment helped create a more open and representative government.

Interesting Fact: The 17th Amendment was one of several major reforms of the Progressive Era, which also included the direct election of local officials and the use of referendums to allow citizens to vote directly on laws.

Who chose senators before 1913?

State legislaturesThe PresidentThe Supreme CourtThe people directly

What year was the 17th Amendment ratified?

1787191319201890

What was a major problem with the old system?

Too many senatorsCorruptionNo electionsToo few laws

Why did reformers want direct elections?

To reduce corruptionTo make voting fasterTo help political machinesTo stop referendums

How did the 17th Amendment change democracy?

Gave more power to peopleEnded all electionsWeakened the SenateCreated political machines

What argument did critics of the amendment make?

It weakened states' rightsIt was too democraticIt was not neededIt lowered taxes