Introducing KNOVA — A free reading app with curriculum-aligned passages on History & Science for Grades 3-8Learn More →

Three-Fifths Compromise and Slavery in Constitution — Reading Comprehension

No ratings yet

Premium Resource

Grades

Standards

D2.HIS.2.3-5
D2.HIS.3.3-5
RI.4.3
RI.4.4
W.4.2

Rate this resource

Send Feedback / Report an Issue

About This Reader

This history reading passage examines the Three-Fifths Compromise and the role of slavery in the U.S. Constitution, offering students an opportunity to analyze how conflicting interests and beliefs shaped the nation's founding document. The passage uses a compare/contrast structure, integrates a primary source quote, and explores multiple perspectives, including those of Northern and Southern delegates and enslaved people. Students will encounter key academic vocabulary, analyze causes and effects, and consider the legacy of this controversial compromise. The lesson aligns with D2.His.2.3-5, D2.His.3.3-5, RI.4.3, RI.4.4, and W.4.2. Included are a Spanish translation, read aloud audio, a comprehension quiz, explanatory writing prompts, and a T-Chart graphic organizer for comparing perspectives. This is an essential resource for developing critical thinking and historical reasoning skills related to early American history and the Constitution.

CONTENT PREVIEW

Three-Fifths Compromise and Slavery — The Three-Fifths Compromise, stated that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person for both representation and taxation.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an important agreement made during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. Delegates from the original thirteen states gathered in Philadelphia to create a new Constitution for the United States. One of the biggest debates was about how states would be represented in the new Congress. The issue centered on whether and how enslaved people would be counted for representation and taxation purposes.

At the time, the population of Southern states included a large number of enslaved people, while Northern states had far fewer. Southern delegates wanted to count enslaved people fully when determining how many representatives each state would have in the House of Representatives. This would give the South more political power. However, Northern delegates argued that since enslaved people had no rights as citizens, they should not be counted at all for representation. This conflict made it difficult for the delegates to reach an agreement.

In order to move forward, the delegates sought a compromise. After heated debate, they decided that each enslaved person would be counted as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of enumeration. This meant that only three out of every five enslaved people would be included when determining a state's population for both representation in Congress and taxation by the federal government. The Three-Fifths Compromise was written into Article I, Section 2 of the new Constitution.

The compromise solved the immediate problem of political gridlock at the Constitutional Convention, allowing the delegates to complete their work and form a new government. However, the solution was deeply flawed. By counting enslaved people as only a fraction of a person, the compromise denied their full humanity. It also gave Southern states more influence in Congress than they would have had if only free people were counted, strengthening the political power of slaveholding states.

The effects of the Three-Fifths Compromise lasted for many decades. It increased the number of Southern representatives in the House and affected the outcome of many important national decisions, including elections and the passage of new laws. The compromise did not address the moral problem of slavery itself. Instead, it showed how political decisions sometimes ignore or worsen injustices in order to maintain unity or achieve ratification of important documents.

The Three-Fifths Compromise is a clear example of how the struggle for power, the need for negotiation, and the realities of regional differences shaped the early history of the United States. Understanding this compromise helps us see how the foundations of the nation's government were built on both cooperation and conflict, and how the consequences of those choices continued to affect American society for generations.

Interesting Fact: The Three-Fifths Compromise was officially ended by the 13th Amendment in 1865, when slavery was abolished throughout the United States.

When was the Three-Fifths Compromise made?

1787180018651776

Where did the Constitutional Convention meet?

PhiladelphiaBostonNew YorkWashington, D.C.

Who wanted enslaved people counted fully?

Southern statesNorthern statesWestern statesAll states

Why did Northern states oppose counting enslaved people fully?

Enslaved people had no rightsThey had more slavesThey wanted more taxesThey disliked the South

How did the compromise affect Congress?

Gave South more powerGave North more powerEnded slaveryAdded new states

What was a negative result of the compromise?

Denied enslaved people full humanityBanned CongressCreated new lawsHelped slavery end