Comparing Iroquois and American Government — Reading Comprehension

The Iroquois Confederacy and the United States are both known for their complex government systems that unite different groups under one structure. The Iroquois Confederacy, also called the Haudenosaunee, was formed by six Native American nations in northeastern North America. Each nation kept its own local leadership but participated in a larger council to make decisions for the whole group. In a similar way, the early United States was made up of thirteen colonies, each with its own government, but also part of a federal system led by a central government. This comparison helps us see how different societies have solved the problem of balancing unity and local independence.

Both the Iroquois and American governments used representative assemblies. In the Iroquois system, each nation chose leaders called sachems to represent them at the Grand Council. These sachems debated and made decisions on issues affecting all the nations. Similarly, the United States created Congress, where elected representatives from each state meet to make national laws. This structure allowed both systems to give a voice to member groups while keeping the whole confederacy or union strong.

Another important feature of both systems is their federal structure. In a federal system, power is shared between a central government and local governments. The Iroquois Grand Council could make decisions about war, peace, and treaties, but each nation kept control over its own daily affairs. In the United States, the federal government handles issues like defense and currency, but states manage education and local laws. This division of power protects the interests of smaller groups and prevents any one group from becoming too powerful.

Despite these similarities, there were also important differences. The Iroquois system placed great emphasis on reaching consensus. Leaders worked to agree on decisions that benefitted everyone, rather than simply voting and following the majority. In contrast, the U.S. government generally makes decisions based on majority rule. The Iroquois also included clan mothers, who played a key role in selecting and advising sachems, while the early American government limited official roles mostly to men.

The influence of the Iroquois Confederacy on American government is recognized by many historians. Some Founding Fathers, like Benjamin Franklin, admired the Iroquois way of uniting different nations while respecting their independence. Evidence shows that the Iroquois model helped inspire the U.S. Constitution’s ideas of federalism and representative assemblies. However, the two systems still reflected their own unique histories and cultures.

When comparing the Iroquois and American governments, it becomes clear that both faced the challenge of building unity among diverse peoples. By studying their structures, assemblies, and decision-making methods, historians better understand how different societies create effective governments. This analysis reveals the importance of both cooperation and the protection of local rights in building a strong nation.

Interesting Fact: The Iroquois Confederacy is one of the oldest participatory democracies in the world, existing centuries before the United States was founded.

What is the Iroquois Confederacy?

Who were sachems?

What did Congress represent?

Why did both governments use representatives?

How were decisions made in the Iroquois system?

What is a federal system?

The Iroquois influenced the U.S. Constitution. True or false?

What does consensus mean?